Update on stats 2019-11
trashcan at ellael.org
Mon Dec 2 11:16:56 CET 2019
Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane at dukhovni.org> wrote:
> Also adoption of ECDSA P-256 (algorithm 13) continues to grow,
> and the number of domains using P-256 KSKs has almost reached
> parity with RSA-SHA256 (algorithm 8), which is just ahead for
> now, but likely not for very much longer.
My KSK and ZSK are both of algorithm 8 and 2048 bits in size.
Is it correct to assume that -due to the growing adoption of algorithm 13- that this algorithm should be preferred?
If so, I would like to migrate.
But, I do have some questions to the community beforehand:
#) Can one mix KSK and ZSK algorithms?
(I do have a rollover of my ZSKs due in a couple of days. Thus starting with ZSKs would be convenient.)
#) Would it be wise to increase from 2048 to 4096 bits size?
Thanks in advance and with kind regards,
More information about the dane-users