Validating an SMTP server

Simson Garfinkel simsong at acm.org
Mon Sep 7 23:19:51 CEST 2015


Viktor,

Thanks for finding this.

The problem appears to with getdns...  it's returning that CNAME lookups are bogus when in fact they are not.

I have filed a ticket request with the getdns team.

https://github.com/getdnsapi/getdns-python-bindings/issues/33 <https://github.com/getdnsapi/getdns-python-bindings/issues/33>

Until this is resolved, people should not use my validator, as the results are untrustworthy with regards to CNAME records.

Simson



> On Sep 7, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane at dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:10:38PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> 
>> And yet the validator claims the TLSA RRset is "bogus",
>> reports failure:
>> 
>>    http://ec2.simson.net/dane_check.cgi?host=openssl.org
>> 
>> 	BOGUS DNS CNAME lookup _25._tcp.mta.openssl.org. = wildcard._dane.openssl.org.
>> 
>> Something's not quite right here...
> 
> The issue seems to be systemic:
> 
>    http://ec2.simson.net/dane_check.cgi?host=nlnetlabs.nl
> 
> 	BOGUS DNS CNAME lookup _25._tcp.nlnetlabs.nl = 3.1.1._dane-both.nlnetlabs.nl.
> 
>    http://ec2.simson.net/dane_check.cgi?host=spodhuis.org
> 
> 	BOGUS DNS CNAME lookup _25._tcp.mx.spodhuis.org. = _globnix-tlsa.spodhuis.org.
> 
>    http://ec2.simson.net/dane_check.cgi?host=wizmail.org
> 
> 	BOGUS DNS CNAME lookup _25._tcp.wizmail.org. = _cert301.wizmail.org.
> 
> All three are in fact fine.  So the handling of TLSA CNAMEs seems
> to be broken.
> 
> -- 
> 	Viktor.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.sys4.de/cgi-bin/mailman/private/dane-users/attachments/20150907/8fc392eb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dane-users mailing list